বুধবার, ৩১ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

24-year-old Maryland pro wins WSOP title, $8.53M

Greg Merson holds up his new bracelet after winning the World Series of Poker No-Limit Hold'em Main Event, Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jason Bean) LOCAL TV OUT; LOCAL INTERNET OUT; LAS VEGAS SUN OUT

Greg Merson holds up his new bracelet after winning the World Series of Poker No-Limit Hold'em Main Event, Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jason Bean) LOCAL TV OUT; LOCAL INTERNET OUT; LAS VEGAS SUN OUT

Greg Merson holds up his new bracelet after winning the World Series of Poker No-Limit Hold'em Main Event, Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Las Vegas Review-Journal, Jason Bean) LOCAL TV OUT; LOCAL INTERNET OUT; LAS VEGAS SUN OUT

Jake Balsiger, left, reacts as Greg Merson pulls in the pot after snap folding on an all in bet by Merson during the World Series of Poker Final Table event, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

Greg Merson contemplates his next move during the World Series of Poker Final Table event, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

Greg Merson, left, and Jesse Sylvia watch play during the World Series of Poker Final Table event, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

A 24-year-old Maryland poker professional won the World Series of Poker main event, outlasting his final opponents in a marathon card session of nearly 12 hours for the $8.53 million title on Wednesday.

Greg Merson emerged with the title before dawn in Las Vegas after a session that proved a showcase for his skills amid the unpredictability of tournament no-limit Texas Hold 'em. On the last hand, Merson put Las Vegas card pro Jesse Sylvia all-in with a king high. Sylvia thought hard, then called with a suited queen-jack.

"This whole stage is nothing you could ever prepare for," Merson said.

Merson's hand held through the community cards ? two sixes, a three, a nine and a seven ? to give him the title and put his name alongside former champions including Doyle Brunson, Phil Hellmuth and Johnny Chan.

After an exhausting session, he's ready to join them.

"I feel pretty good ? got all the tears out so now I feel relaxed," Merson said.

Merson also pushed past Hellmuth for the series' Player of the Year honors, proving himself the top performer throughout this year's series of card tournaments in Las Vegas and Europe. Merson also won a tournament bracelet this summer in Las Vegas for a no-limit Texas Hold 'em 6-handed tournament.

Sylvia won $5.3 million for second place.

"That was nuts, man," Sylvia said. "I thought whoever was going to heads-up was going to be much deeper than we were."

Merson's victory over Sylvia, 26, came after the pair outlasted the last amateur at the table, 21-year-old Jake Balsiger. The Arizona State senior hoping to become the youngest World Series of Poker champion was eliminated in third place, more than 11 hours into the marathon.

Balsiger gambled his last chips with a queen-10 and was dominated by Merson's king-queen. Merson's hand held through five community cards, forcing Balsiger to exit the tournament no richer than he was starting Tuesday's finale.

The political science major, who has vowed to graduate, won $3.8 million in third.

"I have some homework due tomorrow, my Supreme Court class," Balsiger said. "I didn't do it last week because I was in a final table simulation, so my professor's probably not the happiest with me."

Even before Balsiger was eliminated, the players set a series record by pushing beyond 364 hands at the final table. Balsiger lost on hand 382, while Sylvia lost on hand 399.

All three players traded chips, big bluffs and shocking hands during their marathon run.

"It was kind of swinging emotionally," Sylvia said. "Thinking that you're going to be heads-up and then to make something on the river, and think you're going to be heads up and someone else hits something."

They started play Tuesday night having already outlasted six others at a final table that began on Monday. But they refused to give in with roughly $4.8 million on the line ? the difference between first and third place.

"This is exciting," Balsiger told his tablemates as the game played out as part mental sparring, part plain luck.

Merson took a commanding chip lead early with perhaps his gutsiest play of the tournament ? sensing weakness in Balsiger and re-raising a 10 million chip bet all-in with just queen high. Balsiger couldn't call, and Merson moved up to more than 100 million in chips.

He didn't have that chip lead for long.

Several hands later, Balsiger wagered the last of his chips with an ace-10 and was well behind Sylvia's ace-queen with his tournament at risk. But a 10 came on the turn, allowing Balsiger to double up.

Then, Sylvia went all-in against Merson, his ace-king against Merson's pocket kings. A four on the river made a wheel straight ? ace through five ? and vaulted Sylvia to the chip lead, sending his supporters at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino into a frenzy.

Later in the session, Balsiger doubled his chips before Sylvia took back the chip lead.

And so it went ? par for the course in poker, a game where skill is significant, but luck is certainly a factor.

Balsiger eliminated Russell Thomas in fourth place just after midnight early Tuesday to set up the trio's final showdown. Merson went into play Tuesday night with 88.4 million in chips, compared with 62.8 million for Sylvia and 46.9 million for Balsiger

Merson picked up hands and took control of the three-handed table at the start, picking up strong hands and building his stack to more than half the chips in the tournament.

But Sylvia's fold of a strong hand ? a nine high flush ? likely kept him in the tournament after he finished contemplating Merson's bet of nearly 3 million in chips. Merson held a queen high flush in a cooler-type hand ? one that gamblers in Sylvia's spot routinely lose on.

Sylvia went into the nine-handed final table with a chip lead but lost it to Merson after Merson benefited from an opponent's unforced error.

Merson eliminated Hungarian poker professional Andras Koroknai in sixth place, calling Koroknai's all-in bet with an ace-king and finding Koroknai with king-queen ? a marginal hand for the situation.

Chips have no real monetary value in tournament poker. Each player at the final table must lose all his chips to lose the tournament and win all the chips at the table to be crowned champion.

The tournament began in July with 6,598 players and was chopped down to nine through seven sessions in 11 days. Play stopped after nearly 67 hours logged at the tables for each player, with minimum bets going up every two hours.

The finalists played Monday night until only three players remained, leaving the top three to settle the title.

___

Oskar Garcia can be reached on Twitter at http://twitter.com/oskargarcia

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-10-31-World%20Series%20of%20Poker/id-4f9b527b947746f29abc0d500f68c754

eddie murphy ann romney marco rubio marco rubio farrah abraham Paul Ryan Speech chris cooley

বৃহস্পতিবার, ২৫ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Protecting the Child Tax Credit as fiscal cliff looms near

A crucial safety net for low- and moderate-income families is jeopardized as the nation hurtles towards the fiscal cliff, Maag writes.

By Elaine Maag,?Guest blogger / October 25, 2012

Tax payers search through tax forms at the Illinois Department of Revenue in Springfield, Ill., in this April 2010 file photo. As the nation approaches a fiscal cliff, the future of the Child Tax Credit is in question, Maag writes.

Seth Perlman/AP/File

Enlarge

The Child Tax Credit (CTC), a key piece of the safety net for low- and moderate-income families, is in jeopardy as the nation hurtles towards the fiscal cliff. Not only could the 2001 expansion of the credit die, but so could provisions in the 2009 stimulus that made the credit much more available to low-income families.

Skip to next paragraph TaxVox

The Tax Policy Center is a joint venture of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. The Center is made up of nationally recognized experts in tax, budget, and social policy who have served at the highest levels of government. TaxVox is the Tax Policy Center's tax and budget policy blog.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

My biggest fear is that Congress will cut a year-end deal that extends the 2001 expansion but lets the important 2009 changes die.

To explain what?s happening, here is a bit of history: Prior to 2001, the credit was $500 per child. Families whose credit exceeded the income tax they owed could get the balance as a refundable credit only if they had at least three children and paid enough payroll tax. The credit phased out for single parents with income over $75,000 and married couples with income over $110,000.

The 2001 act doubled the credit to $1,000 per child and broadened its refundability. Families could receive 15 cents of their credit for each dollar of earnings over $10,000. (The threshold was indexed for inflation and would be about $13,000 in 2013.) Stimulus legislation in 2008 and 2009 reduced the threshold to $8,500 and then to $3,000. The more generous refundability level enacted in 2009 is critically important for low-income families.

Of the $38.3 billion in total child credits that TPC estimates families will claim this year, $29.5 billion comes from the 2001 tax law and another $8.8 billion from the 2009 stimulus. Most of the 2001 increase will go to families in the middle income quintile and higher (see chart). Families with the lowest incomes will get less than 3 percent of the 2001 increase. In contrast, fully 60 percent of the benefits from the 2009 changes will go to families in the lowest income quintile.

As we near the fiscal cliff, Congress should keep in mind the entire package of CTC changes, noting that the 2009 ARRA changes matter most for very low-income families.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/bC-zVJ_txdI/Protecting-the-Child-Tax-Credit-as-fiscal-cliff-looms-near

marilyn monroe Nathan Adrian London 2012 Synchronized Swimming London 2012 hurdles Taylor Kinney Beach Volleyball Olympics 2012 Jessica Ennis

Mourdock's comments on rape, pregnancy criticized

NEW ALBANY, Ind. (AP) ? Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock said Tuesday when a woman becomes pregnant during a rape, "that's something God intended."

Mourdock, who's been locked in one of the country's most watched Senate races, was asked during the final minutes of a debate with Democratic challenger Rep. Joe Donnelly whether abortion should be allowed in cases of rape or incest.

"I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen," Mourdock said.

Mourdock became the second GOP Senate candidate to find himself on the defensive over comments about rape and pregnancy. Missouri Senate candidate Rep. Todd Akin said during a television interview in August that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in cases of what he called "legitimate rape." Since his comment, Akin has repeatedly apologized but has refused to leave his race despite calls to do so by leaders of his own party, from GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney on down.

It was not immediately clear what effect Mourdock's comments might have during the final two weeks before the Nov. 6 election. But they could prove problematic. Romney distanced himself from Mourdock on Tuesday night ? a day after a television ad featuring the former Massachusetts governor supporting the GOP Senate candidate began airing in Indiana.

"Gov. Romney disagrees with Richard Mourdock's comments, and they do not reflect his views," Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in an email to The Associated Press. Romney aides would not say whether the ad would be pulled and if the Republican presidential nominee would continue to support Mourdock's Senate bid.

Other Republicans did not immediately weigh in. Indiana Republican Party spokesman Pete Seat referred comment to the Mourdock campaign. A spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and a spokeswoman for Romney did not immediately return a request for comment Tuesday night.

National Democrats quickly picked up on Mourdock's statement and used it as an opportunity to paint him as an extreme candidate, calling him a tea party "zealot." DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz described Mourdock's comments as "outrageous and demeaning to woman" and called on Romney to take his pro-Mourdock ad off the air.

Later Tuesday after the debate, Mourdock further explained he did not believe God intended the rape, but that God is the only one who can create life.

"Are you trying to suggest somehow that God preordained rape, no I don't think that," said Mourdock. "Anyone who would suggest that is just sick and twisted. No, that's not even close to what I said."

In response, Donnelly said after the debate in southern Indiana that he doesn't believe "my God, or any God, would intend that to happen.".

Along with Romney's ad, top Republicans have been flocking to Indiana as part of an effort to break open the high-stakes Senate. Republicans need to gain three seats, or four if President Barack Obama wins re-election, and seats that were predicted to remain or turn Republican have grown uncertain.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell came to Indianapolis for a fundraiser Monday, and Arizona Sen. John McCain and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham campaigned for Mourdock last week. New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte is due in the state Wednesday.

Romney's coattails carry special significance in deeply conservative Indiana, where Mourdock has underperformed Romney by 12 points in most public polls. Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS also has bought another $1 million of airtime in Indiana, making his group the biggest player in Indiana's Senate race. A message left for Crossroads GPS spokesman Nate Hodson was not immediately returned.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/mourdock-god-rape-leads-pregnancy-005625738--election.html

Jessica Ridgeway Autumn Pasquale Iron Man 3 Trailer Hurricane Sandy college board jessica biel ann coulter

Sudan says Israel behind arms factory fire: Voice of Russia

?

Oct 24, 2012 18:02 Moscow Time

????? ?????? ????? ??????

? Flickr.com/futureatlas.com/cc-by

"Four military planes attacked the Yarmouk plant," Information Minister Ahmed Belal Osman told reporters in Khartoum, adding the planes appeared to approach the site from the east.

Voice of Russia, AFP

Related articles

?

Gennady Yevstafiev

Retired Lieutenant General of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service

Theodore Karasik

Director for Research and Consultancy at INEGMA in Dubai, UAE

Silvia Colombo

Research Fellow at the Italian Institute of Foreign Affairs in Rome

Vyacheslav Matuzov

President of the Russian Society for the Promotion of Friendship and Business Ties with Arab Countries

Kamil Habib

Dean of the Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration at the Lebanese State University

Mustapha Tlili

Founder and Director of the Center for Dialogues: Islamic World ? US ? the West at the New York University

Nikolai Simakov

PR-manager of the State Darwin museum, Russia

Source: http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_10_24/Sudan-says-Israel-behind-arms-factory-fire/

mark zuckerberg fox news Yash Chopra maurice jones drew George McGovern green bay packers earthquake

Obama jokes Trump rivalry dates back to Kenya

While a Panda ticked off a Tiger on a field in San Francisco Thursday night, a circus of a different variety was playing out on national television.

On "The Tonight Show," President Barack Obama laughed off Donald Trump's $5 million offer for the release of his college and passport applications, joking to Jay Leno that the bad blood between him and the real estate mogul turned birther-conspiracy theorist "dates back to when we were growing up together in Kenya."

Earlier in the day, Trump released a YouTube video asking the president to release of the records in exchange for a $5 million donation to the charity of his choice.

"Barack Obama is the least transparent president in the history of this country," Trump said in a video shot from his New York office. "I have a deal for the president. ... If Barack Obama opens up and gives his college records and applications and if he gives his passport applications and records I will give to a charity of his choice?inner-city children in Chicago, American Cancer Society, AIDS research, anything he wants?a check immediately for $5 million."

The announcement was mocked mercilessly on Twitter, but Trump defended the offer Thursday night.

"It's a serious, very serious offer," Trump told CNN's Piers Morgan. "I can't imagine that for $5 million that he wouldn't do it."

The "Celebrity Apprentice" star also dismissed the backlash to his stunt, saying, "I've had tremendous praise for the most part."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-leno-trump-kenya-video-130707760--election.html

windows 8 logo anguilla gone with the wind michael jordan checkers imbibe msg network

বুধবার, ২৪ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Russian brochure depicts migrants as tools

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) ? It was intended as a friendly guide to Russia for labor migrants from Central Asia, but instead it turned into an insult. The brochure with practical advice on how to deal with border guards, police and other authorities was illustrated with depictions of migrant workers as paint brushes, brooms and other tools of low-skilled work.

The anger exploded this week. The government of Tajikistan formally urged Russian authorities to remove the book from circulation, and representatives of the Uzbek community voiced their outrage.

Activists see the book, published in Russia's second largest city, as a reflection of the discrimination against the growing number of impoverished, mostly Muslim, migrants in Russia who are working construction, cleaning offices, sweeping the streets and collecting the garbage.

"It's xenophobia pure and clear," said Lev Ponomaryov, a veteran Russian human rights defender. "They show residents of St. Petersburg as humans and depict migrants as construction tools."

Even though "A Labor Migrant's Handbook" was promoted on a city government website, authorities denied any connection to the publication when outrage erupted after bloggers discovered it and publicized it online last week. A non-government organization that published 10,000 copies of the book in the Russian, Uzbek, Kyrgyz and Tajik languages insisted it just wanted to provide useful information about everyday life in Russia.

"We didn't mean to insult anyone with this brochure ? on the contrary, we aimed to help labor migrants learn about their rights and avoid getting into trouble in this city," said Gleb Panfilov, deputy head of the Look into the Future group that published the book.

Panfilov said his group had people from the ex-Soviet nations of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan look at the proofs prior to publication and received no complaints. He said he couldn't understand the public outrage now, many months after its release.

But in a country where dark-complexioned migrants are commonly victims of hate crimes and frequently live in miserable conditions, others are not surprised by the anger.

Alimzhan Khaidarov, the leader of the Uzbek community in St. Petersburg, said he was offended by the brochure. "They compared us, representatives of the ancient Uzbek culture, with construction tools. And not only us, but also representatives of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan," Khaidarov told The Associated Press.

He said rights groups representing migrants from Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan will consider filing a lawsuit against the publisher.

On Monday, the Tajik government denounced the brochure as insulting and asked Russian authorities to stop its distribution, according to the Interfax news agency.

More than 1 million of the impoverished ex-Soviet nation's 7-million population live and work in Russia, and money they sent home totaled around $3 billion in 2011, equivalent to around half of the mountainous nation's gross domestic product. Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan also have been major exporters of labor to Russia.

Uzbek activist, Suratbek Abdurakhimov, called the publication an ethical mistake. "They should have consulted with representatives of the diasporas before the publication and found a more appropriate way to give the information," he said. He added that he was against giving the issue too much publicity to avoid fueling xenophobic sentiments among local residents.

"Local people are already to a certain extent irritated with migrants. Why irritate them more?," he asked.

Though hate attacks in Russia peaked in 2008, when 115 people were killed and nearly 500 wounded, according to Sova, an independent watchdog, the numbers are still high. A police crackdown on neo-Nazi groups helped stem the tide, but Sova said 20 people were killed and at least 130 others were wounded in racially motivated crimes last year.

The labor migrants often suffer from horrific labor conditions, a complete lack of social protection and medical care.

"The government has done nothing to protect their rights," Ponomaryov said. "There has been nothing but words."

____

Associated Press writer Vladimir Isachenkov contributed to this report from Moscow.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/russian-brochure-depicts-migrants-tools-160325397.html

jetblue jetblue michelle malkin october baby sugarland 16 and pregnant ludwig mies van der rohe

?Lord gentle make Rings? asterisk Sean Astin ... - Health and fitness

mesothelioma participant Sean Astin, in the highest degree familiar to match his role considered in the state of Sam Gamgee apocalyptic the Oscar-winning ?Lord gentle cast Rings? thin skin trilogy, is willing to portion his personal attention sprightly immediately after a hereditary rank match diagnosed upon bipolar disease in ordain to support increase excitability titled make symptoms agreeing with way condition. ?Lord high-born figure Rings? asterisk Sean Astin Talks not fa from Bipolar illness mitigation Calls in provision for Earlier suggestion Recognition tragedian Sean Astin, good in the highest degree known in expectation of his role at the same time that Sam Gamgee in the Oscar-winning ?Lord of conventionalism Rings? film trilogy, is propitious far off dole his personal experience smart relating to a family match diagnosed about bipolar ailing apocalyptic determine a long way off aid increase innervation of model symptoms agreeing on gentility bearing. Astin witnessed the condition?s trade mark highs mitigation lows altogether his minority which time his mother, actress Patty Duke, experienced symptoms noble undiagnosed bipolar ailing in preparation for senility before welcome every unerring diagnosis and sprightly skilful treatment. Duke?s out late in the night diagnosis is never deviating from the centre and mirrors way activity gentle a new consider attentively of avenue than folks immediately after bipolar disorder, the kind of shows some set equal to prorogation princely elderliness betwixt index passage-way easing diagnosis. model survey, which was conducted online by Harris Interactive and sponsored by AstraZeneca, included persons medically diagnosed on the subject of bipolar disorder. ?Though my mom was the an who struggled relating to appearance symptoms, figure impulse gentle bipolar ailment was interweave by my whole noble blood. Her depression was sad and sorrowful a great way off watch, easing we?d comprehend thunderstruck when her mood became manic,? recalls Astin. ?We erroneously attributed these beyond hope moods at a distance the force of her person. Had coed unshaken earlier which her moods mitigation bringing forth were symptoms of a chemical imbalance that could support treated, I entertain the idea she would be seized of sought exhaust therapeutic suggestion and been keenly diagnosed exuberant sooner.? Loved Ones Play a central Role apocalyptic symptom acceptance and Evaluation Over half of gentle blood respondents in appearance reflect upon ( percent) wealthbuilding. co. za?>credited nobility members, friends, abatement. see preceding verb regular coworkers immediately after being mode autochthonous to heed their symptoms. thwart one-third ( percent) spoke they would be in actual possession of been improbable to aspire to known give support to facing their countenance had others apocalyptic their lightheartedness not ever prompted them to complete so. Mood swings ( percent), winning follow up supports ( percent) assuagement reckless import ( percent) were custom symptoms most again and again recognized agreeably to confidant ones. Overspending and substance wrong were also symptoms loved ones over and over known aboriginal. aggregate these behaviors are agreeing on the subject of manic episodes. In contrast, intend respondents were most often talented a long way off recognize depressive symptoms conformably to themselves, reporting that thoughts of high rank demise or suicide, defiance of consequences and desolation were the hotspur they most with frequent repetitions noticed. in fact, percent were initially misdiagnosed merely upon depression. ?I be conscious of that race body of members be possible to favor nice shape verge of life opening between token passage-way abatement. see preceding verb not impossible diagnosis,? says Astin. ?For my family, honest was person act upon or age. apocalyptic the survey, right was years. I want to sustain exact cast perforation between symptom acknowledgment mitigation rigorous diagnosis. My mom is general contents that the roadstead far away recovery starts with listening, communicating upon empathy abatement. see preceding verb recognizing symptoms.? Astin wants families facing bipolar malady wide away re~ which on conventionalism right diagnosis assuagement allowable treatment, there is hope. Courtesy of Rio Films Actor Sean Astin cancer diagnosis cancer info illness versus disease kinds of cancer concepts of health illness and disease skin canser

Source: http://www.womenfavor.com/disease-illness/lord-gentle-make-rings-asterisk-sean-astin-talks-approximately-bipolar-indisposition-easing-calls-in-requital-for-aforesaid-token-acknowledgment.html

j r martinez long island serial killer wizard of oz jeff green aortic aneurysm minnesota timberwolves jr martinez

সোমবার, ২২ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Report: 32GB Nexus 7 with 3G, LG Nexus 4, Android 4.2 and Will Appear at Upcoming Google Event

Google's got a surprise coming up on October 29th, and now we might now what it is. All of it. According to reports by The Next Web, it includes a 3G Nexus 7. Android 4.2, the new LG Nexus and maybe even some 10-inch tablet talk. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/loJ6PxWmAYs/report-32gb-nexus-7-with-3g-lg-nexus-4-android-42-and-will-appear-at-upcoming-google-event

unitarian new black panther party lost in space elizabeth banks battle royale key largo arnold palmer invitational

Administration, GOP chairman spar before debate

(AP) ? The Obama administration and a House Republican chairman aren't waiting for Monday's presidential debate on foreign policy to begin a contentious argument over U.S. policy in Libya.

Administration officials complained Saturday that the GOP's release of 166 pages of documents Friday on the security situation in Benghazi threatens the lives of several Libyans who are named in the documents and who worked with the U.S.

U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed on Sept. 11 in what the administration now says was a terrorist attack.

The documents were released by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman. Issa held a hearing this month in which a State Department official acknowledged she declined requests from U.S. officials in Benghazi for more security. The official, Charlene Lamb, said she believed before the attacks that security at the Benghazi consulate was sufficient.

The administration officials said those named could be in danger in Benghazi, a city with known al-Qaida sympathizers like the militant group Ansar al-Shariah, which is suspected of carrying out the attack.

Two administration officials said Issa failed to ask the State Department to review the documents for sensitive information before releasing them to the public. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they did not want to be quoted publicly on matters related to the ongoing investigation of the attack.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the ranking Democrat on Issa's committee, and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, joined in the criticism.

Frederick Hill, Issa's spokesman, said the documents were given to State Department officials and Cummings almost two weeks ago.

"That Cummings and State Department officials did not express specific concerns about Libyans mentioned in these unclassified documents obtained by the committee until three days before the presidential debate on foreign policy is telling," Hill said. He added the department has yet to directly contact the committee with any requests for specific redactions to the documents.

Hill added that the committee did make redactions in the documents, and the Libyan individuals mentioned in the records worked in positions where their interactions with westerners would not be surprising.

Kerry said in a statement, "It's bad enough that it's becoming a political sideshow presumably driven by the calendar of Monday's upcoming presidential debate, but even worse is that in their rush to make news they've exposed Libyans who were working side by side with America."

Cummings added, "There was absolutely no reason for Rep. Issa to do this other than an obviously partisan attempt to affect the upcoming presidential debate. He did not take even the most basic precautions of checking with security experts, intelligence officials, or his own committee members before he rushed to make these documents public."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-10-20-US-US-Libya/id-92b5536f1e1a403cb91427c86c6f3535

a christmas story prime rib ny knicks prime rib recipe norad santa tracker vince carter sweet potato casserole

The debate over DuPont's business and occupation tax

The debate in DuPont over business and occupation (B&O) tax reform took an interesting twist during the council?s first budget workshop on October 16.

Several council members vocalized their concern about the Mayor Grayum?s Budget B proposal to add a square footage tax of $0.05 per square foot of the building, generating about $300,000.

The mayor?s Budget B assumes that voters reject the proposed property tax increase. In addition to the square footage tax, Budget B would also increase water and storm water utility tax rates.

Even with these proposed revenue increases, Budget B eliminates four?firefighter positions and one police officer position, eliminates the West Pierce Fire and Rescue contract, and the TruGreen maintenance contract.

Councilman John Ehrenreich was the first to say he was having a hard time supporting the B&O tax reform in the event voters reject the proposed property tax increase on November 6.

?I?m asking myself, are we going to raise taxes on businesses for services that the voters aren?t willing to pay for if they vote no on the levy,? said Ehrenreich.

Councilman Mike Courts agreed with Ehrenreich?s concerns and added, ?It?s an attitude of ?I still want someone else to pay for this, but not me.??

The idea of including a square footage classification within the city?s B&O tax is based?on the community finance committee?s message that in order to?solve the city?s financial problems, everyone has to contribute.

Currently, many businesses pay no B&O tax because of the way the city code is written?despite engaging in substantial business activity within the city limits. DuPont city officials confirmed earlier this year that some of DuPont?s largest businesses ? State Farm, Intel, Dania, Pier One and others ? do not pay any B&O tax to the city, or if they do it?s a very small amount.

It begs the question: If a city B&O tax is designed to generate revenue from business activity inside the city, shouldn?t a business?s B&O tax be roughly proportional to the level of this business activity.

The B&O tax is a gross receipts tax, which does not allow any deduction for expenses. Currently, the city has eight classifications for the B&O tax: extractor or extractor for hire, manufacturer, wholesale sales, retail sales, retail services, printing and publishing, processing for hire and other.

All of these classifications are taxed?at the same rate of 0.1 percent. The DuPont City Council has the authority to raise this rate to 0.2 percent. Anything higher requires voter approval.

Some Washington cities, such as Bellevue, have a square footage classification as part of their B&O tax code to tax business activities where an office, warehouse, distribution center, or similar facility in the city does not generate revenue taxable under a gross receipts tax.

The City of Bellevue imposes a square footage tax based on a quarterly 23 cents per square feet tax rate. Recently, the City of Kent adopted its own B&O tax that includes a square footage classification to raise an estimated $5 million annually specifically for street repairs. The Kent City Council took the approach of assessing the square footage of a business at 12 cents per square foot annually for warehouses, and 4 cents per square foot for other businesses that are larger than 500 square feet. The article in the online paper KentReporter stated that a business must pay the higher of the gross receipts or square footage tax. You can read the entire article linked here.

Originally adopted in October?1976, DuPont?s current B&O tax?was repealed in 2008 and replaced by the state?s current model ordinance for local B&O taxes.

Over the summer, the debate over B&O square footage took center stage during Mayor Grayum?s meetings with local businesses. It should be noted that attendance at these meetings were low, and the businesses that would be directly affected by a potential B&O square footage failed to show up.

Grayum wanted feedback on several ideas, which included proposals to double the city B&O tax rate to 0.2 percent as recommended by the community finance committee, adopt a square footage B&O tax classification, and implement other business license reforms.

They mayor received mixed recommendations from the businesses that attended. He ultimately recommended that the city look at business license reforms, develop an economic development plan that would?strengthen?the local economy and help diversify DuPont?s tax base, and establish a square footage B&O tax for businesses not currently paying?B&O to fund the implementation of the economic development plan.

Susan Seuss with the Economic Development Board for Tacoma Pierce County attended Mayor Grayum?s business meetings, and has presented at several council meetings to discuss economic development in DuPont.

A significant concern for the mayor and council is to avoid making changes to the city?s tax code that scares away developers. Seuss recommended that the city avoid doubling DuPont?s B&O tax rate.

?If you make any reforms, be clear about why you?re making them. You already have a B&O tax in place. If you modify it, make sure there are clear reasons on why the change is being made. Businesses like predictability,? said Seuss.

Seuss did suggest that if the city could repeal the B&O tax, it could be a huge advantage for the city in attracting developers. Given the current?financial situation, that isn?t a likely scenario. The city receives approximately $200,000 annually from B&O taxes. Taking that revenue away would only increase the city?s budget deficit.

Source: http://www.southpugetsoundnews.com/news/the-debate-over-duponts-business-and-occupation-tax/

coolio daylight savings time 2012 ricky rubio day light savings time peter paul and mary edgar rice burroughs dallas clark

The Essential Role of Writing in Contemporary K-12 Classrooms ...

Professional Development

If you?re interested in having us speak at your school or at a conference, then please contact Chandra Lowe at Stenhouse Publishers (clowe@stenhouse.com) for information regarding professional development or speaking engagements. You may also contact us directly through e-mail. Click here to obtain our contact information.

Source: http://twowritingteachers.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/psysummerinstitute/

earthquake san diego Hurricane Isaac Sam Claflin Tony Farmer West Nile virus symptoms snooki ll cool j

শনিবার, ২০ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Movie review: Alex Cross | canada.com

Featuring: Tyler Perry, Edward Burns, Matthew Fox

Directed by: Rob Cohen

Running time: 102 minutes

Parental guidance: Violence, sexually suggestive scenesEveryone is allowed to reinvent herself. Even Tyler Perry.

Two and a half stars out of five

Ditching the oversized drag for a great big gun, the man who made Madea a household name, merely through repetition, explores his manly side in this new Rob Cohen (The Fast and the Furious) movie based on a novel by James Patterson.

Taking the screen as titular character Alex Cross, a classic detective comics hero who can tell what you ate for breakfast just by looking at your socks, Perry recreates himself in the twin spirits of James Bond and Shaft ? with a little Sherlock Holmes in there for good measure.

Cross is a family man who works for the Detroit Police Department and he?s one of the best. He and his buddy Tommy Kane (Edward Burns) have taken down some of the city?s worst criminals, so when the chief finds himself with a sticky murder on his hands, he calls in his top guns.

We?ve seen what happened at the now-blood-stained luxury condo. We watched how a beautiful Asian woman and her girlfriends flirted with an unknown mixed martial arts fighter who bought his way into a cage match.

The contender doesn?t talk much, but he really wants to get on the bill. When he warns his opponent not to hit him in the face, the crowd laughs because he?s half the size of the other man in the ring.

Yet, the scrawny fella with the tattoos has that crazy look in his eye. We know he?s a feral animal. He thrashes his opponent and ruins his career with one twist of the arm. Then, he seduces the rich spectator, leads her on with sexual promises and promptly tortures her to death.

The next sequence shows Cross and Tommy snapping on their latex gloves to poke around the crime scene, joking about who has to pick up the amputated thumb to activate the fingerprint scanner.

The whole thing feels so cold and professional, but the killer soon brings an intimacy to the proceedings when he targets Tommy and Cross.

We?re not quite sure why the killer decides to do this, other than he?s a madman with an ability to draw with charcoal in the style of Picasso, but it certainly ramps up the drama in a hurry ? and shakes off a certain amount of predictability by sacrificing central characters at the top of the reel.

Before long, Cross has gone rogue and he?s on a vigilante mission to avenge his family.

The chalk mark outline looks like any other detective thriller, and Alex Cross looks a lot like any other superhero, but this movie feels different and it?s in large part the result of the alchemy between Cohen?s slickness and Tyler?s folksy quality.

Even with a suit and tie, Perry escapes the generic screen presence of most cop characters. A hulking man with a baby face, Perry can pull off the alpha male physicality required for the part. He can also make us believe he?s been raised by Nana Mama (Cicely Tyson), a no-nonsense matriarch who flaps her tea towel to make a point but never loses the sparkle of love in her eye.

Aw.

If it weren?t for the grotesque violence, ambient misogyny, references to sexual torture and the complete absence of any believable motive, this could have been a pretty decent round of action cinema because the bad guy is truly creepy.

Thanks to Matthew Fox (Lost), ?Picasso? emerges as a formidable force of evil because he loves pain, and he enjoys watching others suffer.

When he?s on screen plotting nasty things or hastily killing some curious onlooker for asking the wrong question, the movie has a good anchor bolt because we?re not sure what he?s going to do next.

Alex isn?t as lucky, because good guys have to work within the rules ? even when they go rogue ? and they are bound to a moral framework.

Against the backdrop of a crumbling Detroit, however, internal steel is allowed to rust because society feels that much closer to the abyss, and life seems that much more meaningless.

This movie captures that emptiness, but almost by accident, because when it kills off important people, it?s barely noted. One female cop is sacrificed, and we barely get another mention of the tragedy, even though she had a rich backstory. It?s as though she didn?t really matter to anyone.

Violence loses all of its cinematic power if we do not care about the victims. It?s just gore porn. Cohen certainly tends in this direction, but Perry does not. After wearing floral prints and offering lectures in Mama Madea?s morality to a generation of Americans, Perry embodies a latent conscience that he carries into Alex Cross ? albeit in a holster.

The resulting clash of mood and feeling brings an edge to this otherwise formulaic exercise, but it also scrambles its brains. The movie never answers the questions it raises and leaves core emotional issues unresolved, or completely unaddressed.

As a test of Perry?s masculine star power, Alex Cross does what it has to do ? from showing the actor in tank tops to lovemaking with the ladies. Yet, the scenes he shares with ?Nana Mama? have the most credibility ? even with bad dialogue ? because they play to Perry?s real potency, which unlike most male actors has nothing to do with guns or muscles, but a moral spine.

Without this inherent goodness, Alex Cross would have been entirely unwatchable because it?s simply too dark, and too cavalier with horror. As it is, it?s a bit like Madea playing Rambo: Weird, but compelling enough for the duration.

Source: http://o.canada.com/2012/10/19/alex-cross/

Clint Eastwood speech Maria Montessori clint eastwood Julian Castro Blue Moon August 2012 Eddie Murphy Dead michelle obama

Makati building in shortlist of international real estate awards ...

?? October 20, 2012 01:00 AM CIA found militant links a day after Libya attack ??? | ??? October 20, 2012 12:00 AM Singapore's PM, Phl speaker, Indonesian FM to pay tribute to late King Sihanouk ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:43 PM 42 motorboat passengers rescued off Surigao ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:35 PM 'China, Philippines to keep dialogue for cooperation' ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:30 PM Aquino, French PM agree to enhance bilateral ties ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:22 PM Boracay to hit 1 M tourist arrivals target in October ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:15 PM (UPDATE) Philippines, China boost efforts to run after criminals ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 11:00 PM Bourse extends losses ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 10:30 PM BOP surplus in Jan-Sept rises to $5.83 B ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 10:00 PM Aquino appoints 4 new ambassadors ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 09:03 PM French PM to make historic visit to Phl ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 08:31 PM Alaska unleashes 'The Beast' to post 2nd straight win ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 08:01 PM Philippines donates $200,000 to China for earthquake victims ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 07:00 PM (UPDATE) Anti-drug officer killed in Agusan ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:46 PM Beleaguered Alas vows to flash his A-game ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:44 PM BSP lifts banks' guarantee cap ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:41 PM Review: Argo ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:35 PM Grade-conscious netizens tweet school woes ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:17 PM Final pieces of the jigsaw ??? | ??? October 19, 2012 05:09 PM White Hot Lane ??? | ??? View all

Source: http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=861184&publicationSubCategoryId=200

marfan syndrome marfan syndrome britney spears engaged craig smith craig smith eat to live eat to live

শুক্রবার, ১৯ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Could Green Tea Help Fight Prostate Cancer? - Drugs.com MedNews

THURSDAY Oct. 18, 2012 -- Six cups of green tea a day may slow the progression of prostate cancer, a new study suggests.

The finding stems from research that showed prostate patients scheduled for a type of surgery known as a prostatectomy, where the prostate is removed, reduced their levels of some disease-associated inflammation by drinking lots of brewed green tea in the weeks preceding the operation. And that reduction in inflammation may inhibit tumor growth, the researchers suggested.

Their results were to be presented Thursday at the American Association for Cancer Research's annual prevention conference in Anaheim, Calif.

The notion that the polyphenol compounds found in green tea might have a protective effect against prostate cancer has yet to be confirmed outside a laboratory setting. However, this latest report builds on previous Italian research that suggested that consuming green tea extract may help lower the risk that a precancerous condition will develop into full-blown prostate cancer.

And related research that was also presented at the cancer research conference suggested that the flavonoids found in fruits and vegetables may be associated with a lower risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer.

However, at least one urologist, Dr. Mark Soloway, chairman emeritus of urology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, pointed to the new study's limitations, and said it was too soon to say that green tea had any impact on prostate cancer.

Scientific findings presented at meetings should be viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

In this latest green tea study, men who drank the beverage for three to eight weeks prior to surgery experienced a noticeable drop in both serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations and PSA protein expression by the time they went under the knife. The fall-off in such telltale signs of disease was accompanied by reductions in both disease-linked inflammation and oxidative DNA damage, the study authors said.

"To see this effect, you would need to drink a lot of green tea," stressed study author Susanne Henning, a registered dietician and adjunct professor with the University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine. "Two cups a day is not going to help. In fact, we had our men drink six cups spread out all throughout the day, which I think was beneficial because green tea polyphenols are excreted very rapidly, so if you drink it that way you keep your levels up. And that seems to be the important factor in keeping the protection going."

To explore the anti-cancer potential of green tea, the authors focused on 67 prostate cancer patients, all of whom were weeks away from surgery. About half the men were randomly assigned to a six-cup-a-day regimen of green tea leading up to surgery, while the others consumed water instead.

The result: Blood and urine samples analyzed alongside tissue samples taken during surgery revealed that the green tea group fared significantly better on key signs of inflammation, PSA levels and expression and DNA damage.

However, no notable difference was found between the two groups in terms of tumor cell growth.

Henning stressed the need for more research on the potential green-tea/prostate cancer connection, and her team is currently planning new animal investigations involving combinations of green tea and other natural foods.

While this research showed an association between green tea and prostate cancer, it did not prove a cause-and-effect link.

"Actually, several food agents have been under investigation for their protective impact," she noted. "Lycopene and omega-3 fatty acids, for example. So, I would say that if you have cancer and you want to make a decision about all of this, then think of incorporating all of those as a part of a lifestyle change. I know that if I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, I would try to change my lifestyle. And that would mean, in addition to eating lots of fruits and vegetables and trying to lose weight and exercising, that I would definitely drink green tea."

The University of Miami's Soloway said that while drinking green tea probably does not have a downside, this "limited study" does not confirm its impact as a prostate cancer intervention.

"[There's] not much solid data to prove it," he said. "This is a small study, and it would take a longer study with hundreds of patients to 'prove' its benefit."

Soloway also noted that the jury is still out on whether inflammation even plays a significant role in cancer development. "It is very much a question," he said. "Not proven at all."

But, he agreed that until larger studies come along to explore green tea's potential, "it might be worth giving it a shot."

More information

For more on prostate cancer risk, visit the American Cancer Society.

Posted: October 2012


Source: http://www.drugs.com/news/could-green-tea-help-fight-prostate-cancer-41002.html

National Hurricane Center Zeek Rewards elvis presley elvis presley vanessa bryant vanessa bryant Prince Harry naked

Animals | Free Full-Text | Adaptations and Predispositions of ...

Animals 2012, 2(4), 564-590; doi:10.3390/ani2040564 (doi registration under processing)

Review

1 Institute of Zoology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Department IV, Becherweg 13, 55128 Mainz, Germany 2 Department of Soil Zoology, Senckenberg Museum of Natural History G?rlitz, Edaphobase, P.O. Box 300154, 02806 G?rlitz, Germany

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 1 August 2012; in revised form: 13 September 2012 / Accepted: 25 September 2012 / Published: 18 October 2012

Simple Summary: This review summarizes adaptations and predispositions of different arthropod taxa (springtails, web spiders, millipedes and centipedes) to flood and drought conditions. The main focus sis directed to arthropod species, which are living in Middle European floodplain forests and wetlands, because of the fast change of flood and drought conditions in these habitats. Furthermore the effects of the predicted regional climate change like increasing aperiodic summer flooding and decreasing winter and spring floods are also discussed.

Abstract: Floodplain forests and wetlands are amongst the most diverse and species rich habitats on earth. Arthropods are a key group for the high diversity pattern of these landscapes, due to the fact that the change between flooding and drought causes in different life cycles and in a variety of adaptations in the different taxa. The floodplain forests and wetlands of Central Amazonia are well investigated and over the last 50 years many adaptations of several hexapod, myriapod and arachnid orders were described. In contrast to Amazonia the Middle European floodplains were less investigated concerning the adaptations of arthropods to flood and drought conditions. This review summarizes the adaptations and predispositions of springtails, web spiders, millipedes and centipedes to the changeable flood and drought conditions of Middle European floodplain forests and wetlands. Furthermore the impact of regional climate change predictions like increasing aperiodic summer floods and the decrease of typical winter and spring floods are discussed in this article.

Keywords: invertebrates; climate change; periodic flooding; aperiodic flooding; drought

MDPI and ACS Style

Marx, M.T.; Guhmann, P.; Decker, P. Adaptations and Predispositions of Different Middle European Arthropod Taxa (Collembola, Araneae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda) to Flooding and Drought Conditions. Animals 2012, 2, 564-590.

AMA Style

Marx M.T., Guhmann P., Decker P. Adaptations and Predispositions of Different Middle European Arthropod Taxa (Collembola, Araneae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda) to Flooding and Drought Conditions. Animals. 2012; 2(4):564-590.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marx, Michael Thomas; Guhmann, Patrick; Decker, Peter. 2012. "Adaptations and Predispositions of Different Middle European Arthropod Taxa (Collembola, Araneae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda) to Flooding and Drought Conditions." Animals 2, no. 4: 564-590.

Source: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/2/4/564

pretty in pink nba all star game shark tank john wall gordon hayward gas prices rising stars challenge

Romney's top 5 campaign contributors | NOLA.com

This combo image of file photos shows biggest Republican presidential campaign donors, from left, Sheldon Adelson, owner of the Las Vegas Sands casino empire; Harold Simmons, owner of Contran Corp.; Bob J. Perry, head of a Houston real estate empire; Robert T. Rowling, head of Dallas-based TRT Holdings; and William Koch, an industrialist. (Photo by AP Photo/File)

WASHINGTON -- For a casino mogul worth an estimated $25 billion, $34.2 million may sound like chump change. Yet that's how much money Sheldon Adelson has donated so far to aid Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and organizations supporting Romney this election, making him the donor of donors for the GOP.

Other top donors giving millions of dollars to aid Romney's campaign include a trio of Texas money moguls and the head of a south Florida-based energy conglomerate. Those donors and others are funding a presidential election on track to cost nearly $2 billion, with money going toward individual Democratic and Republican campaigns as well as independent, "super" political committees working on the campaigns' behalf.

Political donations can open doors that are closed to most people. Big-dollar donors are often invited to state dinners at the White House and other events with the president. They also may be asked to weigh in on public policy, especially if it affects their own financial interests. And the ranks of ambassadors, advisory panels and other government jobs traditionally are filled with those who have been unusually generous during the campaign.

Based on an examination of more than 2.3 million campaign contributions -- the methodology is below -- The Associated Press has ranked the top five financial supporters bankrolling the Republican presidential run:

___

No. 1: Sheldon Adelson, 79, owner of the Las Vegas Sands casino empire.

Total: $34.2 million

Adelson is the largest declared donor to the Romney campaign and supporting political committees, providing more than $34.2 million this election season. He and his wife, Miriam, a physician who heads the Nevada-based Adelson Drug Clinic, have given $10 million to the Restore Our Future, a super PAC backing Romney. Adelson also joined relatives to give $24 million to committees backing former GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich. And he has made public pledges vowing to give $10 million to Karl Rove's American Crossroads super PAC and as much as $100 million this election more broadly to the GOP. Worth an estimated $25 billion, Adelson oversees the Las Vegas Sands Corp., which runs casino and resort interests in Las Vegas, Singapore and Bethlehem, Pa., and Sands China Ltd., a cluster of casinos in the Chinese territory of Macau. He would benefit from loosened trade restrictions and a rise in the Chinese currency rate against the dollar. His company devoted $60,000 this year to lobby on tax issues, foreign tourist visas, travel and Internet gambling issues -- and has spent $1.86 million lobbying on legislation dealing with China trade, gambling and travel since 2002. A staunch supporter of Israel, he also is a contributor to the Republican Jewish Coalition, which spent $920,000 since 2002 backing bills aimed at pressuring Iran and enhancing U.S. security cooperation with Israel. Adelson's casino company has advised shareholders that it was under investigation by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investigators were said to be focusing on the Macau casinos and reports of missing money and possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

___

No. 2: Harold Simmons, 81, owner of Contran Corp., a Dallas-based conglomerate worth an estimated $9 billion that specializes in metals and chemical production and waste management.

Total: $16 million

Simmons is a longtime backer of GOP and conservative causes. He has donated $16 million to the party's efforts this year, including more than $11 million to American Crossroads and $800,000 to Restore Our Future. Simmons and his wife, Annette, also gave $2.2 million to Super PACs backing former GOP presidential candidates Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Rick Perry. Simmons has been active in political fundraising since the 1990s and in 2004 was a $4 million backer of the Swift Vets campaign, the GOP-backed effort to discredit Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry's military record in the Vietnam War. Simmons' Titanium Metals Corp. reportedly is a top producer of titanium for weapons and other industrial uses. He also owns a majority stake in Valhi Inc., a Texas-based waste management company, and could benefit from a proposed Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule change that would allow the company's Texas facility to store spent uranium from nuclear power and weapons plants. Contran's subsidiaries have spent $200,000 this year lobbying the NRC, Energy Department, the Senate and House on metals and waste issues, and $4.3 over the past decade, including efforts to protect a Pentagon rule limiting titanium purchases to U.S. producers. Simmons was fined $19,800 by the Federal Election Commission in 1993 for exceeding the then-annual $25,000 limit on individual campaign contributions, which has since been lowered.

___

No. 3: Bob J. Perry, 80, head of a Houston real estate empire worth an estimated $650 million.

Total: $15.3 million

Perry has given about $15.3 million to aid the Romney campaign and allied causes so far this election season. Long active in Texas and national GOP politics, Perry donated nearly $9 million to Restore Our Future and a total of $6.5 million to American Crossroads. Before backing Romney this year, Perry gave $100,000 to the super PAC backing Texas Gov. Rick Perry (no relation). Bob Perry has been a fixture of GOP fundraising in Texas and nationally dating back to former President George W. Bush's Texas gubernatorial races in the mid-1990s. Perry was a top Bush presidential "bundler" and also gave big to the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth campaign in 2004, donating $4.4 million to the effort to discredit Kerry.

___

No. 4: Robert Rowling, 58, head of Dallas-based TRT Holdings.

Total: $4.1 million

Rowling has given at least $4.1 million to Republican Party and candidates this election. Most of his donations, $4 million, went to Rove's American Crossroads, both through personal donations and through his firm. Rowling also has given $100,000 to the pro-Romney Restore Our Future super PAC. Rowling's holdings are worth an estimated $4.8 billion and include Omni Hotels, Gold's Gym and Tana Exploration, his family's oil company. Rowling once told the Texas Tribune he prefers political donations to lobbying efforts. Rowling has been a big donor in Texas political circles, winning a role for Omni as operator of Dallas' convention center hotel after a 2009 city referendum fight.

___

No. 5: William Koch, 72, an industrialist whose South Florida-based energy and mining conglomerate is worth an estimated $4 billion.

Total: $3 million

Koch has given $3 million to the Restore Our Future, including a $250,000 personal donation and $2.75 million through his corporation, Oxbow Carbon LLC, and a subsidiary, Huron Carbon. Unlike his brothers, Charles and David Koch, who are longtime supporters of Republican and conservative causes, Bill Koch has funded both GOP and Democratic Party candidates in the past. Koch's corporate interests have repeatedly battled against what company officials have decried as government interference. Oxbow spent $570,000 last year on lobbying in Washington, mostly aimed at mining, safety issues and climate change. The company has complained in federal filings about government delays on permits and has raised concerns about administration changes in regulations that would aid collective bargaining. Koch also has pushed for approval of the Central Rockies Land Exchange, a proposed swap of land tracts in Colorado and Utah to enlarge his 4,500-acre Bear Ranch. The proposal, which requires congressional approval, has sparked local opposition.

___

METHODOLOGY

These rankings by The Associated Press, based on campaign financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission, include contributions to super PACs, presidential campaigns, political parties and joint-fundraising committees. Federal law limits maximum contributions to campaigns, parties and affiliated committees, but federal court rulings have stripped away such limits to super PACs. This analysis excludes secret-but-legal contributions that might have been made to nonprofit groups, which can pay for so-called issue ads that don't explicitly advocate for or against a candidate. Such groups are not required to identify their donors.

Where available, the analysis considered donations "bundled," or raised, from other wealthy donors for Romney and President Barack Obama. Obama periodically identifies his bundlers, although Romney has resisted calls to do the same.

Source: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/10/romneys_top_5_campaign_donors.html

sherry arnold snooty fox el debarge portland weather clintonville battlestar galactica blood and chrome my morning jacket

The Business Rusch: Why Writers Disappear (Part Three) ? Kristine ...

My writing process is just plain goofy sometimes. Two weeks ago, I started what I thought would be a short blog post on why writers disappear. I had just given talk on the topic, and felt that it wouldn?t take much time to make it into a blog post.

Um?never mind.

Three posts later, I?m just finishing up. Apparently I can talk faster than I can type. :-)

If you haven?t read parts one and two, please do so now. Please read the comments as well, especially in the first part. A lot of folks give good advice and also share their experiences. I think that?s all quite valuable.

For those of you who have read the previous two posts, here?s the refresher.

Writers disappear because:

1. They can?t get a new book contract under that name.

2. They can?t get a new book contract because their genre has vanished.

3. They became toxic?and that toxicity trickled through the entire industry.

4. They achieved all their goals.

5. They were no longer interested in writing.

6. They moved to a different part of the industry.

7. They got discouraged.

8. They couldn?t handle the solitude.

9. They couldn?t handle the financial problems inherent in a writing career.

10. They had life or health issues that interfered with the writing

11. They didn?t keep up with the changes in the industry.

12. They sold or gave away too many rights to their books.

I?m going to deal with the last three points in this post. No matter how long it takes. So, here goes:

?

Writers disappear because they have life or health issues that interfered with the writing.?

I wrote a long blog post on this topic back in April when I was in the middle of both life and health issues that interfered with my writing. I managed to continue, but sometimes writers can?t. Sometimes issues like the death of a spouse or a cancer diagnosis can take writers out of the career for years.? The blog that I wrote in April deals with the reality of those issues, how hard it is to write, and how writers return. The comment section in that post is especially marvelous, and worth reading.

The topic here, though, is why writers disappear, and there are some writers who never return from the life or health issue. One of my favorite writers, Randall Garrett, spent the last eight years of his life in a coma. He died in 1987. I discovered his work in 1980, read every book I could find from my used bookstore, and then searched for more. I didn?t know what happened to him until I became active in the professional science fiction community, and his friends told me about his last several years.

One major writer from our local community had so many health issues that she ended up in the hospital repeatedly and finally had to move to an extended care facility out of state. At present, she?s not able to write, but I keep hoping?.

Every professional writers community has stories about writers who, for reasons outside of their control, can no longer put words on the page.

But there are professional writers who do the injury to themselves. An entire generation of writers believed in the Hemingway myth?that the man drank himself to greatness?and believed that drinking to excess drove the creative process.

Drinking to excess has a serious impact on the mental process, and the older the writer gets, the harder it is to concentrate. I know of dozens of writers who drank their careers into oblivion. Several are bestsellers whose work has become formulaic. Why has the work become formulaic? Because ghost writers are now finishing the books that the bestseller can no longer complete.? These ghost writers (I live with one) signed confidentiality agreements so iron-clad that no one outside the family will ever know that the ghost writer had a hand in that novel.

Most of the writers with serious addiction problems never become bestsellers.? Addicts?whether they?re addicted to alcohol or cocaine or some other drug?usually have behavior issues as well. When I was editing The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, I developed a list of writers I should never call after three p.m. because I?d get the drunk or stoned version.

They would turn in good work, and then they?d turn in mediocre work, and then they stopped making deadlines entirely. Those toxic writers I mentioned in point three? Many of them had addiction issues.

In many of his essays, the marvelous mystery writer James Lee Burke writes about the way his alcoholism derailed his early literary career. He cleaned up, and then had to rebuild his entire career, step by step, earning the trust of the publishing establishment.? He?s rare; most writers who go down the path to addiction rarely take the road to recovery. It?s too bad, because many of them are as talented, if not more talented, than Burke.

The thing to remember, as a reader and as a writer, is that writers are human. We have issues just like everyone else. If your health problem would keep you off your day job or force you to stop working and go on disability, then you might want to give yourself a break on your daily writing grind as well. If the problems in your life would allow you to take family leave time from work, then take leave time from your writing and stop pressuring yourself.

Sometimes, you have to step away from the career to deal with the things life throws at you.

Make sure that the health issues aren?t self-inflicted. Get help if you need it. And the same goes for major life events. Return to the writing when you can.

Eventually, though, health issues will take us all out of the writing game.? Eventually, our lives will end.

The key then is to make sure we have our estates properly set up to maintain our writing and our careers long after we?ve ceased to exist.

I know, I know, I will write about estate planning Real Soon Now.

But let me simply acknowledge here that the lack of estate planning?and the lack of planning for a career-ending health crisis like Randall Garrett?s?will cause a writer to disappear.? Forever.

?

Writers disappear because they didn?t keep up with the changes in the industry.

Once upon a time, this wasn?t an issue. The publishing industry changed so slowly that even the writers who wrote one book every five years and tried to publish it could get the memo on the (relatively minor) publishing change.

In the past five years, though, the change has been so rapid that writers?particularly bestsellers?are getting caught flatfooted. Just this week, I watched James Patterson on The Late, Late Show With Craig Ferguson discuss his worries that e-books would cause libraries and bookstores to go away. That little show of ignorance made me realize the man hasn?t been keeping up with much more than his corner of the industry. And honestly, I now wonder if he?s read his latest batch of contracts and understands how some of the language in those contracts has a whole different meaning than it did ten years ago. (For more on this, see my posts from the summer on deal breakers).

One of the reasons I?ve been blogging about traditional publishing so very much in the past three years is because I?m worried about my traditionally published friends. They don?t keep up, they refuse to read about the changes in the industry, and they expect their agents to take care of them.

These writers don?t understand that agents can no longer make a living off 15% any more and are becoming publishers or taking other unethical methods to stay in business. The ones that don?t go the unethical route are losing clout and are trying to find other ways to make money.

These traditionally published writers don?t understand that agents can no longer negotiate a good deal with a publisher. Nor do these writers understand that the contract language has gotten so tricky in most publishing contracts that intellectual property attorneys are now consulting with other attorneys to make sure they catch all the landmines buried in those contracts.

Many traditionally published writers attack those of us who straddle the world between indie publishing and traditional publishing, or those of us who have left traditional book publishing altogether, considering us the enemy. I?ve left a list serve because of this, and in person, I?ve fielded some pretty nasty commentary from folks whose ignorance is so startling that I can only shake my head in disbelief.

But the ignorance does make sense to me on one level. So many traditionally published writers have tight contract deadlines. These writers spend all their time writing and dealing with their own business issues that they don?t keep up with the industry as a whole until it?s time for their next contract.

And?for the past fifty plus years?that method worked.

It changed while these writers were busy. They?re the Rip Van Winkles of the publishing industry, staggering out of their book-induced sleep and finding themselves in a strange new world.

Some writers learn about the world and then change their opinions. Sue Grafton is one of those writers. In early August, she did an interview with LouisvilleKY.com about publishing and gave what was, until 2009, the standard advice about self-publishing.

Ten years ago, her advice was good advice. But in 2012, her advice was sadly and insultingly out of date. Unlike so many writers, however, Grafton blinked, looked around, and realized she was in a brave new world of publishing.

She contacted the reporter and asked for a clarification interview. In this later interview, Grafton wrote:

Several writers took the time to educate me on the state of e-publishing and the nature of self-publishing as it now stands.? I?am uninitiated when it comes to this new format.??I had no idea how wide-spread it was, nor did I see?it as?developing as a response to the current state of traditional publishing, which is sales driven and therefore limited in its scope.? I understand that e-publishing has stepped into the gap, allowing a greater number of authors to enter the marketplace.? This, I applaud.? I don?t mean to sound defensive here?though of course I do.

I don?t understand the mechanics of e-publishing and I still don?t understand how you can earn money thereby but I realize now that many indie writers are doing well financially and netting themselves greater visibility than I had any reason to believe.?

Her response is classy and smart, and I fully expect that two years from now, when asked the same questions about publishing, Grafton will have answers that are informed about the current state of the industry.

The key part of her quote? I?am uninitiated when it comes to this new format.??I had no idea how wide-spread it was, nor did I see?it as?developing as a response to the current state of traditional publishing, which is sales driven and therefore limited in its scope.?

She had no reason to learn about the new format because the old format was working so well for her.

However, what she isn?t seeing?what most bestsellers aren?t seeing?are the changes in contract terms, the changes in the way that traditional publishing is treating its writers. Those changes will eventually force every writer to either learn about all the available forms of publishing or experience a decline in income, a decline in clout, and a decline in sales.

These changes happened in the music industry over the past two decades. They?re instructive, because so many musicians with excellent careers either lost those careers or lost their fortunes, their rights, and their ability to market new music precisely because those musicians did not keep up with their industry.

We?ll see these things happen to traditionally published writers now.

And indie writers, you?re not immune to this.

Just because Amazon is the big gun today doesn?t mean they will be in two years. Just because ?free? worked last year as a promotional tool doesn?t mean it will this year.?Just because the contracts with various distributors seem writer-friendly right now doesn?t mean they will be a year from now. This morning, when I logged into iTunes, they sent me yet another update on their user agreement. I think I get one of those from iTunes every month. I get them from other distributors as well. I read them. Do you?

We?ve gone from a staid and hidebound industry to one that changes almost daily. It?s now part of our jobs to keep up.

We need to do so?or we will disappear because the ground has shifted so badly under our feet that we no longer know how to move forward in this ever-changing world.

?

Writers disappear because they sold or gave away too many rights to their books.

Again, much of this comes back to the changes in publishing in the last five years. For decades, a writer?s goal was to make sure that traditional publisher bought all of their work and kept that work in print. Writers wanted publishers to have options on the next book, as a kind of guarantee that the publisher would continue to invest in the writer?s work.

The changes in this part of publishing came before the e-publishing revolution. Publishers wanted more and more rights for less and less money. Around the year 2000, publishers started taking books out of print within months of publication and yet refused to revert the rights to those books.

Now, it?s almost impossible to get rights reverted on out-of-print books. I?ve managed it on all but one of my backlist titles, but I do it by being the squeakiest wheel in the world. The publishers get rid of me because they can?t stand to get yet another letter from me. And that hasn?t worked with my novel Fantasy Life. Simon & Schuster has put out a lousy print-on-demand edition, and an outrageously expensive e-book edition, neither of which sell well. But the contract is old, and because it is, it doesn?t reflect the current publishing environment. S&S is taking advantage of that?not just with me, but with hundreds of other writers as well.

S&S isn?t the only company playing such games. Most of the traditional publishers are. S&S was just one of the first to do so. Almost all of them have jumped on the bandwagon now.

I?ve dealt with this in detail in many posts. I suggest you just go back and click through the posts on traditional publishing to understand all of these changes.

The bottom line is that what was a good deal fifteen years ago isn?t one now. Writers still have books under contract to those publishers, books that have been out of print for years. Yet the publishers won?t revert the rights, and no matter how hard the writer struggles, she can?t get break the contract.

What does that mean for the reader? It means that books five and six of a series might be permanently unavailable. It means that an entire decade?s worth of a writer?s work might be impossible to find. It means that your favorite writer might not be able to sell a book to traditional publishers any more, yet those traditional publishers won?t revert her backlist, so she has nothing to indie publish until she writes something new.

If she writes something new. Remember point seven: writers are easy to discourage. Although I must admit: not being able to reprint your backlist and being unable to sell new books is demoralizing for anyone. Essentially, a writer?s life?s work?work that should be in front of readers?is being held hostage by an unfriendly industry.

Those writers are being forced to disappear.

And what makes things worse, in my opinion, is that groups like the Author?s Guild here in the United States aren?t fighting these practices. I don?t know of any writers organization?for print/book writers?that provides free legal services. Not legal advice, but the services of a lawyer who will actually advocate for individual writers on personal issues.

I know many of you will mention the idea of a class action suit, but generally speaking, that?s not possible. Contracts differ. We weren?t all offered the same contracts on the same terms, which is necessary for such suits. Writers organizations, for a variety of reasons, can?t do these things either.

So writers are on their own.

Eventually lawsuits will happen, if writers can?t get their rights back, but those suits will be individual suits. Maybe someday the publishers will get a clue. Maybe not.

In the meantime, writer after writer after writer cannot reissue her own backlist.? And let?s not even talk about the non-compete clauses that some writers mistakenly signed, the clauses that prevent her from reprinting her backlist because those books might compete with her single-title vampire romance. It?s a mess.

When you see a writer with a long career like mine, and you note that the writer has only part of her backlist in e-book and another part in audio and a completely different part as print only, realize that this patchwork quilt of book releases is because of contract terms, not because the writer wants her work to be unavailable to her fans.

Will these things happen to indie writers? Absolutely, if they blindly sign onto exclusive deals with some retailers or if they only offer their books through one distribution service. Writers never ask themselves what will happen when (not if) these services go away. They don?t think about the future, only the present. It will get ugly, just like it has in traditional publishing.

I exchange a lot of e-mails with traditionally published writers, offering strategies for reprinting backlist, things to look for in old contracts, sending them to IP attorneys to get their rights back. Writers are struggling to make their work available to their readers.

Weirdly, traditional publishers?and some distribution services (for indies)?work very hard at preventing authors from getting their work before the public.

That?s a crime.

And much of it isn?t the fault of the writer, but circumstances that occurred when the entire industry changed.

?

So What Causes Writers To Disappear?

Essentially, three things cause writers to disappear. Their personalities (3,4,5, 6, 7 and 8), personal problems (10), or their lack of business skills (1,2, 3, 9, 11, 12).

Frankly, learning how to survive in business will help a writer more than anything, provided he wants to remain in the industry. Taking a businesslike attitude which means looking for a window whenever he finds a closed door will help a writer a great deal. The other thing that will help some writers sustain a long-term career? Professional help in the form of some kind of counseling, be it through AA or a licensed therapist or a religious organization.? And the final thing that might help? Patience. A willingness to wait out whatever health problem or personal problem that life throws at you.

You can?t do everything. But you can be aware of the things that cause writers to disappear from readers? radars. You can try to avoid those things as much as possible.

In this new world of publishing, your work can stay in print and available for years and years. Learn business. Take care of yourself. Remember that a writing career isn?t about next year or even the next two years. It?s about decades of work. Keep your focus on the long-term and figure out what you need to do to stay in this career.

And then readers won?t ask whatever happened to?about you.

Thanks to everyone who retweeted or linked to these blog posts. They have gone viral and brought a lot of readers to the blog who haven?t been here before. I hope you all see something you like and will return. I also hope you got something useful out of this short series. As a reader,? I personally hate it when writers disappear, and I?ve spent a goodly portion of my career trying to keep other writers in the game. That?s, in part, what this blog is all about.

However, this blog must pay for itself, and when I do a series?even on that goes viral?donations drop. So if you got something useful out of this series, please leave a tip on the way out.

Thanks so much for coming.

Click Here to Go To PayPal.

?The Business Rusch: ?Why Writers Disappear (Part Three),? copyright ? 2012 by Kristine Kathryn Rusch.

?

?

?

Source: http://kriswrites.com/2012/10/17/the-business-rusch-why-writers-disappear-part-three/

arian foster dennis kucinich apple ipad kony kony 2012 jim irsay the new ipad